In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Parcel 6 Development, Central Artery/Tunnel Project, Boston, Massachusetts
Author(s): B. S. Moffat and E. P. White
Publication: Special Publication
Appears on pages(s): 109-132
Keywords: boat section ramp; deveIopment parceI; lateral analysis; lid structure; seismic load; wind load
Abstract:Completion of the Central A r t e r y b e l Project inchdes development of more that 20 distinct parcels along the original, elevated artery corridor. This paper presents challenges encountered during the design of Parcel 6, which is located between New Chardon and Sudbury Streets in Boston, Massachusetts. The Parcel 6 lid will cover five adjacent cast-in-place concrete boat section ramps. The final use of the lid is not yet known; however, since construction of the ramps is currently underway, the walls were re-designed to accommodate either a landscaped deck, or a five-story building. Design included both wind and seismic lateral analyses of the two types of potential lid structures, with the reinforcing in the ramp walls modified to accommodate both options in order to minimize impacts or retrofits requkd in the future. Changes to the original design included modifying wall heights and reinforcing, and inclusion of interim backwalls for temporary earth support. The landscaped option included preliminary designs of four separate deck structures, skewed portal beams, overhead impact attenuators, and a merge gore area. The building option presumed asymmetrical column loadings and locations, with a comparative analysis of column base shears used to determine maximum loading on the existing ramp walls.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber