In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Validity of Certain Assumptions in the Mechanics of Prestressed Concrete
Author(s): Grover L. Rogers
Publication: Journal Proceedings
Appears on pages(s): 317-330
Keywords: no keywords
Abstract:Validity of certain assumptions of structural mechanics applicable to the analysis of prestressed concrete structures is discussed. Results of field tests conducted in France indicate that the calculated load causing the first tensile crack (based on ordinary elasticity theory) in a prestressed concrete slab may be only one-fifth to one-sixth the actual load. This difference has been accredited to the inapplicability of the assumptions of isotropy, homo-geneity, and elasticity as employed in the theory of elasticity to prestressed concrete slabs. As a result of these tests new concepts have been suggested as a possible basis for a more realistic theory. Analytical and experimental results of a test conducted on a laboratory model of a slab prestressed in two directions show that the assumptions and use of the theory of elasticity are indeed adequate. The load causing the first tensile crack was found to be within a few percent of the load predicted using elastic theory. Such agreement indicates that the discrepancies between theory and practice must be attributed to other causes rather than inherent errors in the theory-of elasticity. While the reasons advanced for the discrepancies in the French tests are not valid, the fact they did occur must not be overlooked.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber