In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Chat with Us Online Now
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Potential Problems in Design for Maximum Flexibility
Author(s): A. J. Carr and M. Tabuchi
Publication: Special Publication
Appears on pages(s): 171-190
Keywords: deflection; flexibility methods; loads (forces); shear properties; standards; stiffness; structural design; Design
Abstract:The New Zealand Standard for design loadings for buildings (NZS4203) was revised in 1992 superseding the earlier standard NZS4203 (1984). Some of the most significant changes in the new code are a considerable increase in the allowable interstory drifts and a marked reduction in the seismic lateral forces for structures with longer natural periods. Designers may now be encouraged to design buildings to the maximum allowable drifts as the resulting buildings will attract smaller lateral loads. Reinforced concrete buildings designed with the new loadings code may be constrained by the minimum reinforcement requirements rather than strength requirement of the loadings code; as a result, they may have a different distribution of strength capacity from that assumed in the code design. Because of this, buildings designed using the capacity design principles may not have the strength distribution that the designer intended. The reasons for this problem are discussed in this paper and the effects of the irregular distribution of strength capacity are investigated using inelastic response analysis. It was found that the large reduction of the design lateral forces resulting from the large allowable interstory drifts may lead to the problem. The design lateral forces or the deflection limits defined in the new code, NZS4203 (1992), may need to be reconsidered.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber