The 16th International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-16) was organized by ACI Committee 440 (Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement) and held on March 23 and 24, 2024, at the ACI Spring 2024 Convention in New Orleans, LA. FRPRCS-16 gathers researchers, practitioners, owners, and manufacturers from the United States and abroad, involved in the use of FRPs as reinforcement for concrete and masonry structures, both for new construction and for strengthening and rehabilitation of existing structures. FRPRCS is the longest running conference series on the application of FRP in civil construction, commencing in Vancouver, BC, in 1993. FRPRCS has been one of the two official conference series of the International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) since 2018 (the other is the CICE series). These conference series rotate between Europe, Asia, and the Americas, with alternating years between CICE and FRPRCS. The ACI convention has previously cosponsored the FRPRCS symposium in Anaheim (2017), Tampa (2011), Kansas City (2005), and Baltimore (1999). This Special Publication contains a total of 52 peer-reviewed technical manuscripts from 20 different countries from around the world. Papers are organized in the following topics: (1) FRP Bond and Anchorage in Concrete Structures; (2) Strengthening of Concrete Structures using FRP Systems; (3) FRP Materials, Properties, Tests and Standards; (4) Emerging FRP Systems and Successful Project Applications; (5) FRP-Reinforced Concrete Structures; (6) Advances in FRP Applications in Masonry Structures; (7) Seismic Resistance of FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Concrete Structures; (8) Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Structures; (9) FRP Use in column Applications; (10) Effect of Extreme Events on FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Structures; (11) Durability of FRP Systems; and (12) Advanced Analysis of FRP Reinforced Concrete Structures. The breadth and depth of the knowledge presented in these papers is clear evidence of the maturity of the field of composite materials in civil infrastructure. The ACI Committee 440 is witness to this evolution, with its first published ACI CODE-440.11, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Bars,” published in 2022. A second code document on fiber reinforced polymer for repair and rehabilitation of concrete is under development. The publication of the sixteenth volume in the symposium series could not have occurred without the support and dedication of many individuals. The editors would like to recognize the authors who diligently submitted their original papers; the reviewers, many of them members of ACI Committee 440, who provided critical review and direction to improve these papers; ACI editorial staff who guided the publication process; and the support of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and the International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) during the many months of preparation for the Symposium.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) 440.1R-15 Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars linearly reduces the bar stress and thereby pull-out capacity of FRP bars to zero from an embedment length at 20 bar diameters (db) or less. Most experimental research and data examine the development length of various FRP bars at longer, more traditional, embedment lengths. A database was created from select available data in literature to compare to empirical standards. This investigation examines the bond performance of short embedded FRP bars into concrete considering a pull-out failure mode to expand the understanding of short embedded FRP bars into concrete. Based upon the database collected, for the glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars, the current 440.1R appear quite conservative. For the basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebar database collected, the current ACI 440.1R-15 provisions appear unconservative for a statistically significant number of the specimen test results within the database. In the case of the carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) database, which is quite limited, the data appears to develop considerably less bond strength than the current 440.1R provisions might suggest which requires deeper investigation for the case of short embedment length bonded CFRP bars.

Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite rebar is a non-metallic concrete reinforcement alternative that has been successfully deployed in hundreds of structural applications globally. The increasing demand for FRP rebar as a metal alternative is driven by its unique value proposition, including lightweight, high strength, magnetic transparency, and most significantly, corrosion resistance. FRP rebar is fabricated through pultrusion, a high throughput composite fabrication process in which, resin-impregnated fiber undergoes rapid cure when pulled through a heated furnace. Considering the open nature of the open pultrusion process, expansion of production capacity for FRP rebar manufacturing demands the use of advanced resins that are free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), enable high throughput production, and deliver an outstanding translation of fiber properties following cure. In this work, we will present an epoxy system that is inherently VOC Free and is tailored to enable high throughput manufacturing of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar at scale. Furthermore, the rapid formation of highly crosslinked structures achieved with this resin system during pultrusion is found to enable outstanding fiber property translation resulting in high modulus (>70 GPa) and corrosion resistance (>80 % tensile strength retention without load) that exceeds existing standards such as ASTM D7957.

The seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures relies on their ability to dissipate earthquake-induced energy through hysteric behavior. Ductility, energy dissipation, and viscous damping are commonly used as performance indicators for steel-RC seismic force-resisting systems (SFRSs). However, while several previous studies have proposed energy-based indices to assess energy dissipation and damping of steel-RC SFRSs, there is a lack of research on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-RC structures. This study examines the applicability of the existing energy dissipation and damping models developed for steel-RC columns to glass FRP (GFRP)-RC ones, where the relationships between energy indices and equivalent viscous damping versus displacement ductility were analyzed for GFRP-RC circular columns from the literature. In addition, prediction models were derived to estimate energy dissipation, viscous damping, and stiffness degradation of such types of columns. It was concluded that similar lower limit values for energy-based ductility parameters of steel-RC columns can be applied to GFRP-RC circular columns, whereas the minimum value and analytical models for the equivalent viscous damping ratio developed for steel-RC columns are not applicable. The derived models for energy indices, viscous damping, and stiffness degradation had an R2 factor of up to 0.99, 0.7, and 0.83, respectively. These findings contribute to the development of seismic design provisions for GFRP-RC structures, addressing the limitations in current codes and standards.

Fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) are commonly used to seismically retrofit concrete structural walls. Limited design guidance for the seismic application of FRP strengthening is currently available to designers in guidelines such as ACI PRC-440.2-17 or standards like ASCE/SEI 41-17. This paper presents the description and results of an experimental effort to investigate the effectiveness of FRP retrofitted concrete walls. The specimen wall thickness was either 6 in or 12 in, which represents a typical range of wall thickness seen in older buildings. To better reflect the most common applications seen in the industry, the walls were retrofitted with FRP, and anchored with fiber anchors only on one side of the wall. The study demonstrates that the effectiveness of FRP is reduced as the wall thickness increases and that the FRP must be anchored to the wall for any tangible benefit. The results are used to assess the current provisions in ACI PRC-440.2-17 and ASCE/SEI 41-17. It is apparent that additional testing is required to better understand the complexities involved in the FRP strengthening of shear walls and such testing is scheduled for the near future.