Title:
Alkali-activated slag mortar as a potential alternative for concrete repair
Author(s):
Janis Moye, Sylvia Keßler, Patrick Sturm
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
370
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
113-124
Keywords:
concrete repair, alkali-activated slag, adhesive strength, bond behavior, durability
DOI:
10.14359/51751753
Date:
5/1/2026
Abstract:
Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) are promising alternatives for the reduction of CO2 emissions in the cement industry. Despite extensive research, their adoption, using Germany as an example, remains low due to potential disruption in manufacturing processes and standardization issues. Furthermore, the precursor output rate of e. g., fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) is limited not only due to general cement substitution but for shortages in their respective industries. As a result, SCMs may only serve as a viable alternative binder in niche applications, such as concrete maintenance and repair. Additionally, the use of dry activators such as Na2CO3 facilitates conventional production methods.
This paper discusses results of sodium carbonate-activated slag mortars that were applied to concrete reference plates (A3-type as described in “Technische Regel Instandhaltung von Betonbauwerken,” eng. technical guideline for maintenance of concrete structures). The performance of alkali-activated slag (AAS) mortars was evaluated in terms of shrinkage behavior, compressive, flexural, and adhesive strength after dry thermal cycling and thunder-shower cycling. Interestingly, the results showed enhanced strength after exposure to these experimental conditions in comparison to ambient temperature curing. This highlights the critical role of proper curing, as AAS mortars are highly susceptible to increased shrinkage when not exposed to sufficient moisture.
The previous results show that AAS mortars - even without optimization - meet the required properties for structural repair class “R3” as defined in DIN EN 1504-3, promoting SCMs as promising alternative binders for these practical use cases.
Related References:
1. Damtoft, J. S., Lukasik, J., Herfort, D., Sorrentino, D., and Gartner, E. M. (2008). Sustainable development and climate change initiatives. Cement and concrete research, 38(2), 115-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008
2. Scrivener, K. L., and Kirkpatrick, R. J. (2008). Innovation in use and research on cementitious material. Cement and concrete research, 38(2), 128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.025
3. Verein Deutscher Zementwerke, VDZ, Hrsg. Dekarbonisierung von Zement und Beton – Minderungspfade und Handlungsstrategien. Düsseldorf, 2020. In German: https://www.vdz-online.de/fileadmin/wissensportal/publikationen/zementindustrie/VDZStudie_Dekarbonisierung_von_Zement_und_Beton.pdf
4. Umweltbundesamt, Hrsg. Dekarbonisierung der industriellen Produktion (DekarbInd) - Teilbericht 3: Bewertung von Dekarbonisierungsmaßnahmen und Erarbeitung von Eckpunkten einer Roadmap für die Zementindustrie. Dessau-Roßlau, 2024. In German: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/07_2024_cc_dekarblnd_tb3.pdf
5. Krivenko, P. (2017). Why alkaline activation–60 years of the theory and practice of alkali-activated materials. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol, 8(3), 323-334. doi: 10.4416/JCST2017-00042
6. Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt), Hrsg. Technische Regel Instandhaltung von Betonbauwerken – Teil 1 Anwendungsbereich und Planung der Instandhaltung. Berlin, 2019. In German.
7. DIN EN 196-1:2016-11, Prüfverfahren für Zement – Teil 1: Bestimmung der Festigkeit. In German.
8. Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau (BAW), Hrsg. BAW-Empfehlung Instandsetzungsprodukte – Hinweise für den Sachkundigen Planer zu bauwerksbezogenen Produktmerkmalen und Prüfverfahren. Karlsruhe, 2019. In German.
9. DIN EN 1766:2017-05, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Prüfverfahren – Referenzbetone für Prüfungen. In German.
10. DIN EN 13687-2:2002-05, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Prüfverfahren – Bestimmung der Temperaturwechselverträglichkeit – Teil 2: Gewitterregenbeanspruchung (Temperaturschock). In German.
11. DIN EN 13687-4:2002-05, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Prüfverfahren – Bestimmung der Temperaturwechselverträglichkeit – Teil 4: Trockene Temperaturwechselbeanspruchung. In German.
12. DIN EN 1542:1999-07, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Prüfverfahren – Messung der Haftfestigkeit im Abreißversuch. In German.
13. DIN EN 12617-4:2002-08, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Prüfverfahren – Bestimmung des Schwindens und Quellens. In German.
14. DIN EN 932-1:1996-11, Prüfverfahren für allgemeine Eigenschaften von Gesteinskörnungen – Teil 1: Probenahmeverfahren. In German.
15. M. J. Setzer, DAfStb, 1977, 280, 48.
16. DIN 66137-2:2019-03, Bestimmung der Dichte fester Stoffe – Teil 2: Gaspyknometrie.
17. Kutti, T., and Malinowski, R. (1982). Influence of the Curing Conditions on the Flexural Strength of Alkali Activated Blastfurnace Slag Mortar. Nordic Concrete Research, (1).
18. Byfors, K., Klingstedt, G., Lehtonen, V., Pyy, H., and Romben, L. (1989). Durability of concrete made with alkali-activated slag. Special Publication, 114, 1429-1466. doi: 10.14359/1827
19. Collins, F., and Sanjayan, J. G. (2001). Microcracking and strength development of alkali-activated slag concrete.Cement and Concrete Composites, 23(4-5), 345-352. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00003-8
20. Bakharev, T., Sanjayan, J. G., and Cheng, Y. B. (1999). Effect of elevated temperature curing on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cement and concrete research, 29(10), 1619-1625. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00143-X
21. Brough, A. R., and Atkinson, A. (2002). Sodium silicate-based, alkali-activated slag mortars: Part I. Strength, hydration and microstructure. Cement and concrete research, 32(6), 865-879. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00717-2
22. Wang, S. D., Scrivener, K. L., and Pratt, P. L. (1994). Factors affecting the strength of alkali-activated slag. Cement and concrete research, 24(6), 1033-1043. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90026-4
23. ltan, E., Erdoğan, S. T. Alkali activation of a slag at ambient and elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(2), 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.003
24. Hi, M., Hang, J. J., Huang, R. Strength and Drying Shrinkage of alkali‐activated Slag Paste and Mortar. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2012(1), 579732. doi: 10.1155/2012/579732
25. Ye, H., Radlińska, A. Shrinkage mechanisms of alkali-activated slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 88, 126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.001
26. Ye, H., Artwright, C., Rajabipour, F., Radlińska, A. (2014). Effect of drying rate on shrinkage of alkali-activated slag cements. doi: 10.5703/1288284315409
27. Ye, H., Artwright, C., Rajabipour, F., Radlińska, A. (2017). Understanding the drying shrinkage performance of alkali-activated slag mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 76, 13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.11.010
28. Collins, F., and Sanjayan, J. G. (2000). Effect of pore size distribution on drying shrinking of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(9), 1401-1406. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00327-6
29. Fan, J., and Zhang, B. (2021). Repair of ordinary Portland cement concrete using alkali-activated slag/fly ash: Freeze-thaw resistance and pore size evolution of adhesive interface. Construction and Building Materials, 300, 124334. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124334
30. Cyr, M., and Pouhet, R. (2015). The frost resistance of alkali-activated cement-based binders. In Handbook of Alkali-Activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes (pp. 293-318). Woodhead Publishing. doi: 10.1533/9781782422884.3.293
31. Liu, Z., Jiao, W., Sha, A., Gao, J., Han, Z., and Xu, W. (2017). Portland cement hydration behavior at low temperatures: Views from calculation and experimental study. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017(1), 3927106. doi: 10.1155/2017/3927106
32. Rübner, K., and Hoffmann, D. (2006). Characterization of Mineral Building Materials by Mercury‐Intrusion Porosimetry. Particle and particle systems characterization, 23(1), 20-28. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.200601008
33. Klobes, P., Rübner, K., Hempel, S., Prinz, C. (2008). Investigation on the Microstructure of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. 8th International Symposium on the Characterisation of Porous Solids, Edinburgh, Scotland.
34. Shi, C. (1996). Strength, pore structure, and permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars. Cement and concrete research, 26(12), 1789-1799. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00174-3
35. DIN EN 1504-3:2006-03, Produkte und Systeme für den Schutz und die Instandsetzung von Betontragwerken – Definitionen, Anforderungen, Qualitätsüberwachung und Beurteilung der Konformität – Teil 3: Statisch und nicht statisch relevante Instandsetzung. In German.