Blast Load Prediction for Deflagration of Low Explosives in Confined Concrete Structures

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Blast Load Prediction for Deflagration of Low Explosives in Confined Concrete Structures

Author(s): Ming Liu

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 364

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 138-146

Keywords: blast load; confined concrete structures; deflagration; internal pressure; low explosives; TNT equivalency

DOI: 10.14359/51745461

Date: 12/1/2024

Abstract:

According to Section 5.4.3 of ACI 370R-14, when design of concrete structures involves containment of internal explosion effects, both shock waves and gas pressures should be considered. For high explosives (HE) detonations, empirical relationships for predicting gas loads are provided in UFC 3-340-02. Logically, the TNT (Trinitrotoluene) equivalencies for low explosives (LE) such as propellants and pyrotechnics are used in some cases to predict the internal gas pressure-time histories, as mentioned in Section 5.2.2 of ACI 370R-14. Section 5.2.2 also points out that “the designer should insist on an adequate determination of TNT equivalency, including energy, pressure, and impulse equivalents.” However, the confined burns of LE without venting generates deflagration so that the gas pressures can last tens of minutes or even hours as long as the internal temperature decays are slow enough. Thus, any dynamic analysis such as single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) is not applicable herein. The confined burns of LE with venting involve complex convective combustion processes where chemical/combustion and aerodynamic experts should play an important role in predicting gas loads. As a result, this paper provides the evidences on why the TNT equivalency should not be used in blast design for containment of confined burns of LE. This paper also provides the simplified procedures in estimating the quasi-static gas loads for the confined burns of LE without and with venting, after briefly comparing intrinsic characteristics in HE detonations with those in LE burns.

Related References:

1. ACI 370R-14 (2014) Report for the Design of Concrete Structures for Blast Effects

2. M. Liu, M. Oesterle, R. Conway, and J. Covino (2018). Modeling and Simulation of HD 1.3 Thermal Initiation Tests on a Small Reinforced Concrete Storage Structures, 2018 International Explosives Safety Symposium & Exposition, San Diego, CA, August 6-9, 2018

3. T. L. Boggs, K. P. Ford, and J. Covino (2013). Realistic Safe-Separation Distance Determination for Mass Fire Hazards, NAWCWD TM 8668, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division

4. A. Farmer, K. P. Ford, J. Covino, T. L. Boggs, and A. I. Atwood (2015). Combustion of Hazard Division 1.3 M1 Gun propellant in a Reinforced Concrete Structure, NAWCWD TM 8742, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division

5. A. Farmer, K. P. Ford, J. Covino, T. L. Boggs, and A. I. Atwood (2017). Combustion of Hazard Division 1.3 M1 Gun propellant in a Reinforced Concrete Structure Part 2. Tests 5 Through 7, NAWCWD TM 8764, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division

6. J. Covino, C. P. Romo, and M. Liu (2018). Structural Response from Combustion Events and Quantity Distance Siting, Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force (JANNAF) 2018 Meeting.

7. DESR (2019) Defense Explosives Safety Regulation 6055.09 (Edition 1)