Title:
Particle Interaction in Metakaolin Suspensions
Author(s):
Sergio Real, Laura González-Panicello, Francisca Puertas, Marta Palacios
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
362
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
535-546
Keywords:
metakaolin, superplasticizers, zeta potential, particle agglomeration, pore solution composition
DOI:
10.14359/51741009
Date:
6/14/2024
Abstract:
Limestone-calcined clay cements (LC3) have received a great deal of interest recently for their lower carbon footprint and suitable hardened properties. However, they are also characterized by having challenging rheological properties that lead to high water demands. While the addition of superplasticizers enhances their initial fluidity, they experience a fast flow loss, the mechanism of which still remains unknown. This study aims at gaining fundamental knowledge on the particle surface properties and colloidal stability in metakaolin suspensions, in the presence and absence of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers. For this purpose, zeta potential, polymer adsorption, particle agglomeration as a function of time, and pore solution composition were evaluated. The experimental results revealed that an increase in pH up to 11 favors OH- adsorption, increasing the absolute zeta potential and therefore favoring interparticle repulsion. In contrast, above pH>11 a decrease of the absolute zeta potential and agglomeration was observed. Regarding the aqueous phase composition, a combination of Ca2+ and SO42- in pore solutions at pH around 12.60, leads to particle agglomeration while the addition of 0.4% PCE superplasticizers efficiently disperse metakaolin particles in suspensions prepared with a synthetic cement pore solution.
Related References:
1. R. Snellings, P. Suraneni, J. Skibsted, Future and emerging supplementary cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Res. 171 (2023) 107199.
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107199
2. K. Scrivener, F. Martirena, S. Bishnoi, S. Maity, Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res. 114 (2018) 49–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017
3. M. Antoni, J. Rossen, F. Martirena, K. Scrivener, Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone, Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (2012) 1579–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006
4. Y. Dhandapani, S. Joseph, D.A. Geddes, Z. Zhao, P. Boustingorry, S. Bishnoi, M. Vieira, F. Martirena, A. Castel, F. Kanavaris, K.A. Riding, Fresh properties of concrete containing calcined clays: a review by RILEM TC-282 CCL, Mater. Struct. 55 (2022) 151. doi: 10.1617/s11527-022-01971-3
5. P. Hou, T.R. Muzenda, Q. Li, H. Chen, S. Kawashima, T. Sui, H. Yong, N. Xie, X. Cheng, Mechanisms dominating thixotropy in limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), Cem. Concr. Res. 140 (2021) 106316. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106316
6. L. Lei, M. Palacios, J. Plank, A.A. Jeknavorian, Interaction between polycarboxylate superplasticizers and non-calcined clays and calcined clays: A review, Cem. Concr. Res. 154 (2022) 106717. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106717
7. R. Sposito, N. Beuntner, K.-C. Thienel, Characteristics of components in calcined clays and their influence on the efficiency of superplasticizers, Cem. Concr. Compos. 110 (2020) 103594. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103594
8. M. Schmid, J. Plank, Dispersing performance of different kinds of polycarboxylate (PCE) superplasticizers in cement blended with a calcined clay, Constr. Build. Mater. 258 (2020) 119576. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119576
9. R. Li, L. Lei, T. Sui, J. Plank, Effectiveness of PCE superplasticizers in calcined clay blended cements, Cem. Concr. Res. 141 (2021) 106334. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106334
10. N. Nair, K. Mohammed Haneefa, M. Santhanam, R. Gettu, A study on fresh properties of limestone calcined clay blended cementitious systems, Constr. Build. Mater. 254 (2020) 119326. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119326
11. Y. Ma, C. Shi, L. Lei, S. Sha, B. Zhou, Y. Liu, Y. Xiao, Research progress on polycarboxylate based superplasticizers with tolerance to clays - A review, Constr. Build. Mater. 255 (2020) 119386. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119386
12. M.H. Derkani, N.J. Bartlett, G. Koma, L.A. Carter, D.A. Geddes, J.L. Provis, B. Walkley, Mechanisms of dispersion of metakaolin particles via adsorption of sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde polymer, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 628 (2022) 745–757. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.166
13. E. Yalçınkaya, C. Güler, The Effects of Electrolyte Concentration, Ion Species and pH on the Zeta Potential and Electrokinetic Charge Density of Montmorillonite, Clay Miner. - CLAY Min. 41 (2006) 853–861. doi: 10.1180/0009855064140224
14. A. Habbaba, J. Plank, Surface Chemistry of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in Cement Pore Solution and Its Impact on the Effectiveness of Polycarboxylate Superplasticizers, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 (2012) 768–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04968.x.
15. J.O. Malta, L.V.S. Oliveira, M.M. Ueki, L.S. Barreto, Characterization and stabilization of nano-metakaolin colloidal suspensions, Powder Technol. 383 (2021) 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.024
16. H. Bessaies-Bey, M. Palacios, E. Pustovgar, M. Hanafi, R. Baumann, R.J. Flatt, N. Roussel, Non-adsorbing polymers and yield stress of cement paste: Effect of depletion forces, Cem. Concr. Res. 111 (2018) 209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.004
17. Y.F. Houst, P. Bowen, F. Perche, A. Kauppi, P. Borget, L. Galmiche, J.-F. Le Meins, F. Lafuma, R.J. Flatt, I. Schober, P.F.G. Banfill, D.S. Swift, B.O. Myrvold, B.G. Petersen, K. Reknes, Design and function of novel superplasticizers for more durable high performance concrete (superplast project), Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (2008) 1197–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.007