Title:
An Innovative Power-Law Equation of Optimal Grading Curves for Dense Packing
Author(s):
Dr Gerard Roquier
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
349
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
143-160
Keywords:
continuous distribution, optimal grading curve, packing density, particle size distribution, Theoretical Packing Density Model (TPDM)
DOI:
10.14359/51732745
Date:
4/22/2021
Abstract:
The search for the optimal grading curve remains an open problem for dense packing in the field of concrete. In France, Caquot considered that the coarsest fraction is the only one that is not submitted to the wall effect. In a grading span and in the case of a fifth root of the diameter as the abscissa parameter, he found a fairly straight broken-line. In some other countries, the Andreasen and Andersen (A&A) cumulative distribution function is a power-law equation with a distribution modulus commonly equal to 0.4 or 0.5. How to unify these two approaches? Validated for ordered and disordered packings and for different particle shapes and textures, the recent Theoretical Packing Density Model (TPDM) clarifies the situation. Firstly, the TPDM highlights curves evolving from A&A’s to Caquot’s as the packing process, characterized by a compaction index K, becomes more and more efficient. Secondly, an innovative power-law equation is proposed to unify the two approaches of A&A and Caquot. The distribution modulus is composed of: K a constantq, the compaction index corresponding to a pouring process Kmin and the ratio d/dmaxwhered is the particle diameter and dmax the largest particle size in the distribution.
Related References:
1. Andreasen, A.H.M., and Andersen, J., 1930, “Ueber die Beziehung zwischen Kornabstufung und Zwischenraum in Produkten aus losen Koernern (mit einigen Experimenten)”, Kolloid-Z., 50, 217-228.
2. Brouwers, H.J.H., 2006, “Particle-size distribution and packing fraction of geometric random packings”, Physical Review E, 74(3), 031309.
3. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, New York.
4. Caquot, A., 1937, “Le rôle des matériaux inertes dans le béton”, Mémoires de la Société des Ingénieurs Civils de France, 90(5), 563-582.
5. Roquier, G., 2019, “A Theoretical Packing Density Model (TPDM) for ordered and disordered packings”, Powder Technology, 344, 343-362.
6. Roquier, G., 2016, “The 4-parameter Compressible Packing Model (CPM) including a new theory about wall effect and loosening effect for spheres”, Powder Technology, 302, 247-253.
7. Roquier, G., 2017, “The 4-parameter Compressible Packing Model (CPM) for crushed aggregate particles”, Powder Technology, 320, 133-142.
8. Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Gao, Q., Liu, C., 2018, “A new mixture design methodology based on the Packing Density Theory for high performance concrete in bridge engineering”, Construction and Building Materials, 182, 80-93.
9. Feret, R., 1892, “Sur la compacité des mortiers hydrauliques”, Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, Mem Doc, 4, 5-164.
10. Faury J., Caquot A., 1958, “Le béton: influence de ses constituants inertes, règles à adopter pour sa meilleure composition, sa confection et son transport sur les chantiers”, 3ème édition, Dunod.
11. Omnés, R., 1985, “Sur l'empilement désordonné d'un système de sphères de rayons différents”, Journal de Physique, 46(2), 139-147.