Title:
Impact of Different PCE Architectures on Flow Performance Depending on Precipitated Ettringite
Author(s):
Y. Chen, S. Wang, P. Juilland, L. Frunz, and J. Zhu
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
329
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
165-174
Keywords:
concrete; PCE; cement; ettringite; sulfatation; Ca-sulfate
DOI:
10.14359/51711212
Date:
9/26/2018
Abstract:
In this article we investigate the effect of precipitation of ettringite on the dispersion effect of four PCE with different structures. We first developed a simple method to qualify commercial cements with respect to early ettringite precipitation. The difference in flow between a paste prepared with the PCE in the mixing water (direct mode) and a paste prepared by adding the PCE after 3 minutes of hydration (indirect mode) can be correlated to amount of ettringite forming for a specific cement. A similar test setup was used to assess the effect of the precipitating ettringite on the flow properties of the different PCE. We found that all tested PCE were impacted by ettringite precipitation but to a very different extent. This suggests that, for concrete applications, the selection of a PCE more robust against variations in ettringite precipitation due to fluctuations in the used raw materials is feasible.
Related References:
1. Nkinamubanzi, P.-C. et al., Superplasticizers in practice, chapter 16, 353-377, in “Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures” by Flatt, R. and Aïtcin, P., Elsevier, 2016, ISBN 978-0-08-100693-1.
2. Frunz, L. et al., Impact of different type of calcium sulfate on early ettringite formation in presence of different PCE, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, 2018
3. Marchon, D. et al., Molecular and submolecular scale effects of comb-copolymers on tri-calcium silicate reactivity: Toward molecular design, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 100 (3): 817-841, Easton, PA: American Ceramic Society, 2017
4. Dalas, F.; Pourchet, S.; Rinaldi, D.; Nonat, A.; Sabio, S.; and Mosquet, M., “Modification of the rate of formation and surface area of ettringite by polycarboxylate ether superplasticizers during early C3A–CaSO4 hydration,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 69, 2015, pp. 105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.12.007
5. Plank, J., and Hirsch, C., “Superplasticizer Adsorption on Synthetic Ettringite.” Special Publication 217 (2003) ACI
6. Marchon, D. et al., Adsorption of chemical admixtures, chapter 10, 219-256, in “Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures” by Flatt, R. and Aïtcin, P., Elsevier, 2016, ISBN 978-0-08-100693-1.
7. Mantellato, S.; Palacios, M.; and Flatt, R. J., “Impact of sample preparation on the specific surface area of synthetic ettringite,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 86, 2016, pp. 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.005
8. Muller, I., Influence of cellulose ethers on the kinetics of early Portland cement hydration. (Universitats Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 2007).
9. Flatt, R. J. et al., in 9th ACI International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, Seville, Spain: ACI, (2009), SP-262, pp. 153–164.
10. Flatt, R. J.; Schober, I.; Raphael, E.; Plassard, C.; and Lesniewska, E., “Conformation of Adsorbed Comb Copolymer Dispersants,” Langmuir, V. 25, No. 2, 2009, pp. 845-855. doi: 10.1021/la801410e