Effect of Aggressive Environments on the Durability and Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete (Prepublished)

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Aggressive Environments on the Durability and Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete (Prepublished)

Author(s): Amir H. Shokouhy, Alireza Javid, Vahab Toufigh, and Mohsen Ghaemian

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume:

Issue:

Appears on pages(s):

Keywords: acid resistance; alkali resistance; durability; concrete; fly ash; geopolymer; marine resistance; ultrasonic

DOI: 10.14359/51750606

Date: 3/19/2026

Abstract:
Geopolymer concrete offers a lower-carbon alternative to OPC concrete, but long-term durability under aggressive exposure remains critical for field adoption. This study evaluated low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes with 0%, 10%, and 20% OPC replacement (denoted GPC100C0, GPC90C10, and GPC80C20) after immersion in tap water, seawater (pH ≈ 7.25), an alkaline solution (pH ≈ 12.5), and an acidic solution (pH ≈ 2.5). Compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) were measured at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Across all conditions, net mass change remained below 3%. In tap water, 12-month reference compressive strengths were approximately 22 MPa (GPC100C0), 40 MPa (GPC90C10), and 43 MPa (GPC80C20). After 12 months, compressive-strength loss was clearly dependent on the exposure medium. In seawater, losses ranged from about 20% (GPC80C20) to 30% (GPC90C10). In alkaline solution, losses were about 5% (GPC100C0), 20% (GPC90C10), and 33% (GPC80C20). In acidic solution, GPC80C20 showed the lowest loss (about 8%), whereas GPC90C10 showed the highest loss (about 30%). UPV in tap water was approximately 3.2 to 3.9 km/s, and UPV–strength relationships were mixture- and exposure-specific (best-fit R² ≈ 0.84). These results provide practical guidance for durability-oriented mix selection and UPV-based in-service condition assessment.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal