Title:
Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Full-Scale Wide Beam-Column Connections with Emulative Detailing
Author(s):
Seon-Hoon Kim, Deuckhang Lee, Wei Zhang, and Thomas H.-K. Kang
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
123
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
253-268
Keywords:
effective beam width; emulative detailing; precast concrete; seismic performance; strong connection; wide beam
DOI:
10.14359/51749377
Date:
5/1/2026
Abstract:
Precast concrete (PC) moment-resisting frame systems with wide beam sections have been increasingly adopted in the construction industry due to their advantages in reducing the span length of PC slabs perpendicular to wide beam members and improving the constructability of precast construction. To further facilitate fast-built construction, this study introduces a novel PC wide beam-column connection system, where the solid panel zone is prefabricated and integrated into the PC column, allowing the upper floor to be quickly constructed without delay due to the curing time of cast-in-place concrete. Meanwhile, the current ACI 318-19 Code imposes strict allowable limits on the width of wide beams and complex reinforcement details as part of a seismic force-resisting system to effectively transfer forces into the joint, considering the shear lag effect. To address this, two full-scale PC wide beam-column test specimens were carefully designed, fabricated, and tested to explore the impact of large beam width and simplified reinforcement details beyond the code limit. The seismic performance was evaluated in terms of lateral strength, deformation capacity, stiffness degradation, failure mechanism, and energy dissipation. Based on the evaluation, the proposed PC wide beam-column connections demonstrated equivalent, or even better, seismic performance than the reinforced concrete control specimen. Additionally, it was found that the presence of corbels can mitigate the shear lag effect in PC wide beam-column connections, and that the current effective beam width limit imposed by ACI 318-19 is conservative for PC wide beam-column connections with corbels.
Related References:
1. Zhang, W.; Lee, D. H.; Kim, S. H.; and Zhang, D., “Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Wide Beam-Column Connections under Ductile Connection Principle,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 122, No. 2, Mar. 2025, pp. 1-12.
2. Zhang, W.; Kim, S. H.; Lee, D. H.; Zhang, D.; and Kim, J., “Seismic Performance of Self-Sustaining Precast Wide Beam-Column Connections for Fast-Built Construction,” Computers and Concrete, V. 33, No. 3, 2023, pp. 339-349.
3. Zhang, W.; Lee, D. H.; Kim, S. H.; Ju, H. J.; and Lee, C. J., “Seismic Performance of Precast Wide Beam-Column Connections with Asymmetrical Anchorage Reinforcement Details,” Engineering Structures, V. 275, 2023, pp. 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115237
4. Memon, S. A.; Zain, M.; Zhang, D.; Rehman, S. K. U.; Usman, M.; and Lee, D. H., “Emerging Trends in the Growth of Structural Systems for Tall Buildings,” Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, V. 5, No. 3, 2020, pp. 155-170. doi: 10.1080/24705314.2020.1765270
5. Bozzo, L., “A Prestressed Partially Precast System,” Concrete International, V. 30, No. 2, Feb. 2008, pp. 35-38.
6. Huang, R. Y. C., and Kuang, J. S., “Predicting Strength of Exterior Wide Beam–Column Joints for Seismic Resistance,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 2, 2020, p. 04019209. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002488
7. Kim, J. H.; Choi, S. H.; Han, S. J.; Jeong, H.; Lee, J. Y.; and Kim, K. S., “Effect of Reinforcing Details on Seismic Behavior of RC Exterior Wide Beam-Column Joint,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 25, No. 4, 2023, pp. 283-296.
8. Kim, J. H.; Jang, B. S.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, Y. J.; Jeong, H. S.; and Kim, K. S., “Experimental Study on Lateral Behavior of Precast Wide Beam-Column Joints,” Earthquakes and Structures, V. 21, No. 6, 2021, pp. 653-670.
9. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
10. Kim, S. H.; Lee, D. H.; Kim, Y. K.; Lee, S. W.; Yeo, U. Y.; and Park, J. E., “Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dry Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections with Special Moment Frame Details,” EESK Journal of Earthquake Engineering, V. 27, No. 5, 2023, pp. 203-211. doi: 10.5000/EESK.2023.27.5.203
11. Kuang, J. S.; Behnam, H.; and Huang, Q., “Effective Beam Width of Reinforced-Concrete Wide Beam-Column Connections,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Structures and Buildings, V. 170, No. 5, 2017, pp. 336-353. doi: 10.1680/jstbu.15.00124
12. LaFave, J. M., and Wight, J. K., “Reinforced Concrete Wide-Beam Construction vs. Conventional Construction: Resistance to Lateral Earthquake Loads,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 17, No. 3, 2001, pp. 479-505. doi: 10.1193/1.1586185
13. Benavent-Climent, A., “Seismic Behavior of RC Wide Beam-Column Connections under Dynamic Loading,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, V. 11, No. 4, 2007, pp. 493-511. doi: 10.1080/13632460601064814
14. Benavent-Climent, A.; Cahís, X.; and Vico, J. M., “Interior Wide Beam-Column Connections in Existing RC Frames Subjected to Lateral Earthquake Loading,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, V. 8, No. 2, 2010, pp. 401-420. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9144-3
15. Gentry, T. R., and Wight, J. K., “Wide Beam-Column Connections under Earthquake-Type Loading,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 675-703. doi: 10.1193/1.1585793
16. LaFave, J. M., and Wight, J. K., “Reinforced Concrete Exterior Wide Beam-Column-Slab Connections Subjected to Lateral Earthquake Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 4, July-Aug. 1999, pp. 577-585.
17. Quintero-Febres, C. G., and Wight, J. K., “Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete Interior Wide Beam-Column Connections subjected to Lateral Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 4, July-Aug. 2001, pp. 572-582.
18. NZS 3101:2006, “The Design of Concrete Structures,” Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
19. EN 1998-1, “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
20. Committee for the Development of Seismic Codes, “Norma de Construccion Sismo rresistente (NCSE-02),” Spanish Ministry of Construction, Madrid, 2002.
21. Fadwa, I.; Ali, T. A.; Nazih, E.; and Mirzabagheri, S., “Reinforced Concrete Wide and Conventional Beam–Column Connections Subjected to Lateral Load,” Engineering Structures, V. 76, 2014, pp. 34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.029
22. ACI Committee 374, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05) (Reapproved 2019),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, 9 pp.
23. Park, R., “Ductility Evaluation from Laboratory and Analytical Testing,” Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, V. 8, 1988, pp. 605-616.
24. ASCE/SEI 41-17, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 416 pp.
25. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352, “Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures (ACI 352R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, ACI, 2002, 37 pp.
26. Eom, T. S.; Park, H. G.; Hwang, H. J.; and Kang, S. M., “Plastic Hinge Relocation Methods for Emulative PC Beam–Column Connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 142, No. 2, 2016, p. 04015111. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001378
27. Hwang, H. J.; Eom, T. S.; and Park, H. G., “Bond-Slip Relationship of Beam Flexural Bars in Interior Beam-Column Joints,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2015, pp. 827-837.
28. Kim, J. H.; Choi, S. H.; Han, S. J.; Hwang, J. H.; Jeong, H.; and Kim, K. S., “Effect of Beam Elongation Phenomenon on Lateral Load Resistance of RC Frame,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 65, 2023, p. 105764. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105764
29. Fan, J. J.; Wu, G.; Feng, D. C.; Zeng, Y. H.; and Lu, Y., “Seismic Performance of a Novel Self-Sustaining Beam-Column Connection for Precast Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames,” Engineering Structures, V. 222, 2020, p. 111096. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111096
30. Kim, J. H.; Lee, D. H.; Choi, S. H.; Jeong, H.; and Kim, K. S., “Seismic Performance of Precast Multi-Span Frame System Integrated by Unbonded Tendons,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 119, No. 5, Sept. 2022, pp. 193-206.
31. Lee, D. H.; Kang, T. H.-K.; Ju, H.; Moon, S. W.; and Yang, I. S., “Seismic Performance of RC Column-Foundation Connections with Combo-Type Mechanical Splices,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 5, Sept. 2019, pp. 173-186.
32. Zhang, W.; Lee, D. H.; Lee, W. J.; Kim, M. S.; and Park, J. Y., “Effect of Cast-In-Place Beams on Seismic Performance of Precast Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 120, No. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 89-102.
33. Feng, F.; Jiang, K.; Hwang, H. J.; and Yi, W. J., “Earthquake Response of Low-Rise RC Moment Frame Structures according to Energy Dissipation Ratio of Beam-Column Joints,” Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, V. 3, No. 1, 2018, pp. 33-43. doi: 10.1080/24705314.2018.1426171
34. Kim, S. H.; Cho, J.; Oh, H. K.; Choi, S. D.; Yeo, U. Y.; and Lee, D. H., “Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dry Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections with Intermediate Moment Frame Details,” EESK Journal of Earthquake Engineering, V. 27, No. 3, 2023, pp. 129-137. doi: 10.5000/EESK.2023.27.3.129