Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) Applicable to Stainless Steel Rebar in Concrete Environment

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) Applicable to Stainless Steel Rebar in Concrete Environment

Author(s): Mohaddeseh Abdolhosseini and Ibrahim G. Ogunsanya Synopsis:

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 366

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 27-48

Keywords: Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN), Stainless Steel Rebar, Cement and Concrete, Pitting Corrosion, Non-Destructive Tools (NDT), Machine Learning, Regression Model

DOI: 10.14359/51749231

Date: 10/1/2025

Abstract:
To overcome the time- and resource-intensive electrochemical assessments used to evaluate the pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steel (SS) rebar alloys, a non-destructive assessment tool such as the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) index is important for decision-making involving building resilient engineering structures. By addressing the limitations of the existing PREN index, initially designed for SS alloys in hightemperature acidic or neutral environments, this study sought to develop a PREN index tailored for highly alkaline ambient-temperature concrete environments through a combination of electrochemical experimental analysis and machine learning modelling. This integrated approach and newly developed PREN index account for variations in SS alloying composition, concrete alkalinity, and environmental exposure conditions, addressing the growing demand for non-destructive, time- and cost-effective, and reliable alternatives for assessing SS rebar corrosion performance. Developed PREN will aid design of new and selection of existing SS alloys for reinforced concrete structures across diverse localities and applications. Two major formulas were reported, one for electrochemical parameters and the other for PREN related to these electrochemical parameters, each establishing their relationship with major SS alloying elements (i.e., Cr, Ni, Mo, Mn), concrete type (i.e. pH of testing solution), and concentration of deleterious species in exposure environment (i.e. chloride, sulphate). This study marks an initial step toward developing a non-destructive corrosion-performance assessment tool for civil engineering applications.

Related References:

1. I.G. Ogunsanya, C.M. Hansson, Detection of the critical chloride threshold of carbon steel rebar in synthetic concrete pore solutions, RILEM Technical Letters 3 (2018) 75–83. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2018.70.

2. I.G. Ogunsanya, C.M. Hansson, Influence of chloride and sulphate anions on the electronic and electrochemical properties of passive films formed on steel reinforcing bars, Materialia (Oxf) 8 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100491.

3.I. Ogunsanya, Influence of alloying elements, testing solution and surface roughness on corrosion behaviour of stainless steel reinforcing bars, 2019.

4. I.G. Ogunsanya, C.M. Hansson, Reproducibility of the corrosion resistance of UNS S32205 and UNS S32304 stainless steel reinforcing bars, Corrosion 76 (2020) 114–130. doi: 10.5006/3360.

5. F. Lollini, M. Carsana, M. Gastaldi, E. Redaelli, Corrosion behaviour of stainless steel reinforcement in concrete, Corrosion Reviews 37 (2019) 3–19. doi: 10.1515/CORRREV-2017-0088/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.

6. D. Coelho, O.A.C. Linares, A.L.S. Oliveira, M.A.S. Andrade, L.H. Mascaro, J.E.S. Batista Neto, O.M. Bruno, E.C. Pereira, Introducing a low-cost tool for 3D characterization of pitting corrosion in stainless steel, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 24 (2020) 1909–1919. doi: 10.1007/s10008-020-04586-2.

7. K. Lorenz, G. Medawar, Über das Korrosionsverhalten austenitischer Chrom-Nickel-(Molybdän-) Stähle mit und ohne Stickstoffzusatz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Beanspruchbarkeit in chloridhaltigen Lösungen, Thyssenforschung 1 (1969) 97–108.

8. M. Renner, U. Heubner, M. 6 Rockel, E. Wallis, Temperature as a pitting and crevice corrosion criterion in the FeCI, test*, Werkstoffe Und Korrosion 37 (1986) 183–190.

9. Werkst. G. Herbselb, -, Korros. 33 (1982) 334–340.

10. R.F.A. Jargelius-Pettersson, Application of the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Concept to Some Highly Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steels, Corrosion 54 (1998) 162–168. doi: 10.5006/1.3284840.

11. Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries-Materials selection and corrosion control for oil and gas production systems Industries du pétrole, de la pétrochimie et du gaz naturel-Choix des matériaux et contrôle de la corrosion pour les systèmes de production de pétrole et de gaz COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT from IHS, 2145.

12. B. Craig, Clarifying the Applicability of PREN Equations: A Short Focused Review, Corrosion 77 (2021) 382–385. doi: 10.5006/3723.

13. E.B. Haugan, M. Næss, C.T. Rodriguez, R. Johnsen, M. Lannuzzi, Effect of Tungsten on the Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance of Type 25Cr Super Duplex Stainless, (2016). doi: 10.5006/2185.

14. R.F.A. Jargelius-Pettersson, CORROSION-FEBRUARY 1998 CORROSION ENGINEERING SECTION Application of the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Concept to Some Highly Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steels, 1998.

15. I.G. Ogunsanya, C.M. Hansson, The semiconductor properties of passive films and corrosion behavior of stainless steel reinforcing bars in simulated concrete pore solution, Materialia (Oxf) 6 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100321.

16. P. Cunningham, M. Cord, S.J. Delany, Supervised Learning, Cognitive Technologies (2008) 21–49. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75171-7_2.

17. V. Nasteski, An overview of the supervised machine learning methods, Horizons 4 (2017) 51–62. doi: 10.20544/HORIZONS.B.04.1.17.P05.

18. J. Han, M. Kamber, J. Pei, Data Preprocessing, Data Mining (2012) 83–124. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381479-1.00003-4.

19. D.E. Hilt, D.E. Hilt, D.W., Seegrist, U. States., Pa.) Northeastern Forest Experiment Station (Radnor, Ridge, a computer program for calculating ridge regression estimates, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pa, 1977. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.68934.

20. Regression, (n.d.).

21. A.E. Hoerl, R.W. Kennard, Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems, Technometrics 12 (1970) 55. doi: 10.2307/1267351.

22. N. Van Kinh, N. Van Kinh, Regularization Methods to Approximate Solutions of Variational Inequalities, Open Journal of Optimization 12 (2023) 34–60. doi: 10.4236/OJOP.2023.122004.

23. R. Tibshirani, Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso, J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 58 (1996) 267–288. doi: 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1996.TB02080.X.

24. H. Zou, T. Hastie, Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 67 (2005) 301–320. https://academic.oup.com/jrsssb/article/67/2/301/7109482 (accessed March 25, 2025).

25. CORROSION Fundamentals of Mechanisms, Causes, and Preventative Methods, (n.d.).

26. A. Marani, T. Oyinkanola, D.K. Panesar, Probabilistic deep learning prediction of natural carbonation of lowcarbon concrete incorporating SCMs, Cem Concr Compos 152 (2024) 105635. doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2024.105635.

27. K.K. Dobbin, R.M. Simon, Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers, BMC Med Genomics 4 (2011) 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-31/TABLES/3.

28. F. Pedregosa FABIANPEDREGOSA, V. Michel, O. Grisel OLIVIERGRISEL, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, J. Vanderplas, D. Cournapeau, F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, V. Dubourg, A. Passos, M. Brucher, M. Perrot andÉdouardand, andÉdouard Duchesnay, Fré. Duchesnay EDOUARDDUCHESNAY, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python Gaël Varoquaux Bertrand Thirion Vincent Dubourg Alexandre Passos PEDREGOSA, VAROQUAUX, GRAMFORT ET AL. Matthieu Perrot, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011) 2825–2830. http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net. (accessed March 25, 2025).

29. S.M. Malakouti, M.B. Menhaj, A.A. Suratgar, The usage of 10-fold cross-validation and grid search to enhance ML methods performance in solar farm power generation prediction, Clean Eng Technol 15 (2023) 100664. doi: 10.1016/J.CLET.2023.100664.

30. C.B. Van Niejenhuis, S. Walbridge, C.M. Hansson, The performance of austenitic and duplex stainless steels in cracked concrete exposed to concentrated chloride brine, J Mater Sci 51 (2016) 362–374. doi: 10.1007/S10853-015-9387-0/FIGURES/10.

31. S.M. Lundberg, P.G. Allen, S.-I. Lee, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30 (2017). https://github.com/slundberg/shap (accessed March 26, 2025).