Title:
ACI-Based Design Approach for Reinforced Concrete Panels in Industrial Facilities
Author(s):
Carlos Alberto Madera Sierra, Saahastaranshu R. Bhardwaj, and Amit H. Varma
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
123
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
29-42
Keywords:
Eurocode 2 (EC2) sandwich model approach; experimental and analytical validation and verification (V&V) approaches; numerical simulation; proposed ACI-based design approach; reinforced concrete (RC) wall panels
DOI:
10.14359/51749163
Date:
3/1/2026
Abstract:
Industrial facilities (such as offshore platforms, power plants, and treatment plants) are typically labyrinthine structures because they possess intricate layouts (resembling mazes or labyrinths), and most of their structural walls are interconnected. These reinforced concrete (RC) structural walls need to be designed for eight simultaneous demands. The existing U.S. codes provide limited procedural guidance for the design of these walls. A novel panel-based ACI (PACI) design approach for RC walls, rooted in the design concepts and formulations of ACI 349 and ACI 318.2, is proposed. The PACI approach is validated using two validation and verification (V&V) approaches. For the first V&V approach, existing experimental data is used to estimate PACI approach-based reinforcement areas, which are then compared against the reinforcements provided in the experiments (and against the reinforcement areas suggested by the Eurocode 2 [EC2] sandwich model approach). Benchmarked numerical models are developed to compare the capacities of specimens using PACI-based reinforcements with experimentally observed capacities, and with EC2-based reinforcement. For the second V&V approach, analytical data of publicly available design demands for real-world structures are used to estimate PACI-based reinforcements for a critical region of a nuclear power plant. Numerical models are developed to compare the capacities of the panels with PACI-based reinforcements against the design demands. The results from V&V1 approach showed that the PACI approach: 1) suggests similar reinforcement areas than those used in the experiments, with an average ratio of PACI suggested reinforcement areas over experimental provided areas of 0.97 for all 21 tests; and 2) suggests similar reinforcement areas that those suggested by the EC2 approach, with an average ratio of EC2-based reinforcement areas over PACI-based reinforcement of 1.01 for all 21 tests as well. For the V&V2 approach, the numerical capacities of the models with PACI suggested reinforcements are greater than or equal to the design demands. The V&V studies illustrate that, despite its methodological simplicity, the PACI approach results in reinforcement recommendations that closely approximate the outcomes derived from the more rigorous procedures inherent to the EC2 approach. The design implementation of the PACI approach is also illustrated using sample calculation.
Related References:
ACI Committee 318, 2019a, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.
ACI Committee 318, 2019b, “Building Code Requirements for Concrete Thin Shells (ACI 318.2-19) and Commentary (ACI 318.2R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 16 pp.
ACI Committee 349, 2013, “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-13) and Commentary (ACI 349R-13),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 196 pp.
Adebar, P., and Collins, M. P., 1994, “Shear Design of Concrete Offshore Structures,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 91, No. 3, May, pp. 324-335. doi: 10.14359/4371
Adebar, P. E., 1989, “Shear Design of Concrete Offshore Structures,” doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Belarbi, A., and Hsu, T. T. C., 1995, “Constitutive Laws of Softened Concrete in Biaxial Tension-Compression,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 562-573. doi: 10.14359/907
Bentz, E., 2000, “Sectional Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Members,” doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 316 pp., https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/13811/1/NQ49840.pdf. (last accessed Jan. 27, 2026)
Bhardwaj, S., and Varma, A., 2017, “Design of Modular Steel-Plate Composite Walls for Safety-Related Nuclear Facilities,” Design Guide 32, American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, IL.
Blaauwendraad, J., 2010, Plates and FEM: Surprises and Pitfalls, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3596-7
Coronado, C.; Malushte, S. R.; Munshi, J.; and Verma, N., 2009, “A Rational Seismic Design Approach for Reinforced Concrete Walls for Nuclear Power Plants,” Transactions of 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20), Espoo, Finland.
Dassault Systemes, 2019, Abaqus Support Documentation, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.
EN 1992-1-1, 2004, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 227 pp.
EN 1992-2, 2005, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 2: Concrete Bridges, Design and Detailing Rules,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 97 pp.
fib, 2008, “Practitioners’ Guide to Finite Element Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” fib Bulletin No. 45, International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 344 pp.
Kirschner, U. H. K., 1986, “Investigating the Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Shell Elements,” doctoral thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Madera Sierra, C. A., 2020, “A Design Approach for RC Panels (Shells) in Industrial Facilities Based on the ACI Codes,” doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Madera Sierra, C. A.; Bhardwaj, S. R.; and Varma, A. H., 2023, “Design of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Wall Panels in Industrial Facilities: Eurocode ‘Sandwich’ Model Approach,” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, V. 27, No. 9, June, pp. 2922-2949. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2022.2090446
Marti, P., and Kong, K., 1987, “Response of Reinforced Concrete Slab Elements To Torsion,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 113, No. 5, May, pp. 976-993. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:5(976)
NRC, 2011, “AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD),” Revision 19, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, 192 pp., https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1117/ML11171A431.pdf. (last accessed Feb. 24, 2026)
Polak, M. A., and Vecchio, F. J., 1994, “Reinforced Concrete Shell Elements subjected to Bending and Membrane Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 91, No. 3, May, pp. 261-268.
Rahimian, A., 2019, “Biaxial Principal Stress Interaction Diagram for Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May, pp. 119-133. doi: 10.14359/51714474
Sener, K. C.; Varma, A. H.; Booth, P. N.; and Fujimoto, R., 2015, “Seismic Behavior of a Containment Internal Structure Consisting of Composite SC Walls,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 295, Dec., pp. 804-816. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.07.038
Vecchio, F. J., 1982, “The Response of Reinforced Concrete to In-Plane Shear and Normal Stresses,” doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., 1986, “The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 83, No. 2, Mar., pp. 219-231.