Title:
Serviceability of Concrete Structures for Explosives Operating Locations and Live-Fire Training Facilities
Author(s):
Michael Pickett, Daniel Richey, Chris Moore, Joshua Umphrey, and Gordon Borne
Publication:
Symposium Paper
Volume:
364
Issue:
Appears on pages(s):
62-79
Keywords:
carbonation front; coring; hardened construction; intentional detonation; personnel protection; structural health
DOI:
10.14359/51745457
Date:
12/1/2024
Abstract:
Reinforced concrete sections have typically been the most used material for hardened protective construction due to their mass and the ductility provided by the reinforcement. The additional mass of these sections reduces deflections and increases dampening, which reduces vibrations. Even for the occasional occurrence of hardened steel structures, the foundation is comprised of reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete structures are hardened for a multitude of reasons. The most common include antiterrorism, force protection, equivalent protection for quantity distance arc violations, personnel protection, prevention of prompt propagation, asset protection, and elastic response during repeated intentional detonations. Many of the structures in the United States (US) used by the Department of Defense (DoD), to accommodate a rapid increase in production and storage of explosives were built during World War II (1941-1945). Facilities used for explosives production, maintenance, research and development (R&D), demolition, testing, and training are commonly referred to as Explosives Operating Locations (EOLs). This puts the average age of many of these facilities close to 80 years-old, which is past their originally intended service life. This paper presents a structural health and visual inspection (SHVI) technique developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Facilities Explosives Safety Mandatory Center of Expertise (FES MCX), the University of Oklahoma, and the Engineering Research and Development Center (ERDC) Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL) for the inspection of reinforced concrete Explosives Operations Location (EOL) facilities and live-fire training facilities [9]. This inspection process has been utilized to inspect over 1500 structures across multiple countries over the last decade and aid DoD installations in planning and budgeting for necessary repairs and future recapitalization priorities. This work does not include application to anti-terrorism or force protection in hardened structures for conventional weapon effects. This process has also been modified for use in live-fire training operations in concrete facilities and coupled with analyses to determine facility adequacy for explosives operations with desired charge weights, based on the given facility’s current structural health rating and its analyzed ability to remain elastic during repeated intentional detonations. The FES MCX partners with ERDC for concrete coring, materials analysis, and testing of samples to determine the estimated remaining service life of concrete structures based on the carbonation front of cored samples determined by the carbonation tests in relationship to the steel reinforcement. Examples of historical application will be given, and details provided on how these methods can lead to improved life-cycle cost for concrete structures and paired with design development criteria for optimal results.
Related References:
1. Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Detonations, UFC 3-340-02, Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, Change 2, 1 September 2014.
2. Hariri-Ardebili, M., Sanchez, L., and Rezakha, R., “Aging of Concrete Structures and Infrastructures: Causes, Consequences, and Cures (C3)", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, V. 2020, May 2020.
3. Zhang W., Pi, Y., Kong, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, P., Zeng, W., Yang, F., “Influence of damage degree on the degradation of concrete under freezing-thawing”, Construction and Building Materials., V. 260, November 2020.
4. American Concrete Institute, 2008, ACI PRC 224-01, Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
5. American Concrete Institute, 2008, ACI 201.1R-08, Guide for Conducting a Visual Inspection of Concrete in Service, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
6. American Concrete Institute, 2019, ACI 318-19, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
7. Department of Defense Explosive Safety Board, 2020, Approved Protective Construction, DDESB Technical Paper No. 15 Revision 4, DDESB, Alexandria, VA.
8. Department of Defense Explosive Safety Board, 2019, Defense Explosives Safety Regulation 6055.09 Edition 1, DDESB, Alexandria, VA.
9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2018, Earth Covered Magazine Aging Study Site Investigation and Inspection Form User’s Guide.
10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1995, Evaluation and Repair of Concrete Structures, EM 1110-2-2002, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.
11. ASTM International, 2006, ASTM C1365-05 Standard Test Method for Determination of the Proportion of Phases in Portland Cement and Portland-Cement Clinker Using X-Ray Powder Diffraction Analysis, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
12. ASTM International, 2015, ASTM E8-16a, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
13. ASTM International, 2016, ASTM C42/C42M-16, Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
14. ASTM International, 2017a, ASTM C39-17b, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
15. ASTM International, 2017b, ASTM C496-17, Standard Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
16. ASTM International, ASTM International, 2017c, ASTM C856 – 17 Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
17. Guthrie, G.D., Carey, J.W., 1998, Geochemical Methods for the Identification of ASR Gel, LA-UR- 98-3570, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
18. M.‐Y. Yu, J.‐Y. Lee, C.‐W. Chung, The Application of Various Indicators for The Estimation of Carbonation and Ph of Cement Based Materials, J Test Eval, v.38 pg. 534‐540., 2010.