Hydration Properties and Physical Characteristics of Belite Cements

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Hydration Properties and Physical Characteristics of Belite Cements

Author(s): Antonio Telesca, Milena Marroccoli, Neluta Ibris, Fulvio Canonico, Daniela Gastaldi

Publication: Symposium Paper

Volume: 362

Issue:

Appears on pages(s): 520-534

Keywords: elite cements; CO footprint; hydration products; sustainability; technical behaviour

DOI: 10.14359/51741008

Date: 6/14/2024

Abstract:
Belite cements (BCs) have been suggested as innovative environmentally-friendly materials, since they can allow a reduction of CO2 emissions up to about 30% with respect to normal portland cements (NPCs); furthermore, the manufacturing process of BC, compared to that of NPC, is characterized by reduced limestone requirement, lower synthesis temperatures and, consequently, reduced specific fuel consumption. The peculiar composition of BC can also be exploited for achieving valuable technical properties (e.g. better durability against sulfate and carbonation attacks as well as low heat of hydration). This paper examines the influence of temperature (20°C and 40°C) on the hydration behavior and the technical properties of a pilot-scale industrial BC (w/c=0.50) up to 180 days. An NPC class 52.5 R was employed as a reference term. It was found that, compared with NPC, BCs showed lower mechanical properties at early ages (2 days), while at longer curing periods, the compressive strength values were always greater at both 20°C and 40°C. However, stability tests displayed that BCs shrank less than NPC in the air, while they exhibited approximately the same expansion values when submerged in water. BC pastes showed the best hydration behavior for curing periods longer than 28 days.

Related References:

1. IEA, “direct emissions intensity of cement production in the Net Zero Scenario, 2015-2030 ”, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/direct-emissions-intensity-ofcement-production-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2015-2030, 2022 (Last accessed October 26,

2023).

2. Xu, D., Cui, Y., Li, H., Yang, K., Xu, W., and Chen, Y., “On the Future of Chinese Cement Industry”, Cement and Concrete Research, 78, 2015, pp. 2–13.

3. Telesca A, Matschei T., and Marroccoli, M., “Study of Eco-Friendly Belite-Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cements Obtained from Special Wastes”, Applied Sciences, V. 10, 2020, p. 8650.

4. Pimraksa, K., Hanjitsuwan, S., and Chindaprasirt, P., “Synthesis of Belite Cement from Lignite Fly Ash”, Ceramics International, V. 35, 2009, pp. 2415–2425.

5. Marroccoli, M., Pace, M.L., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L., “Synthesis of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cements from Al2O3-Rich By-Products from Aluminium Manufacture”, 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technology, Ancona, Italy, 2010, pp. 615-623.

6. Marroccoli, M., Montagnaro, F., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L., “Environmental Implications of the Manufacture of Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Based Cements”, 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technology, Ancona, Italy, 2009, pp. 625-635.

7. Staněk, T., and Sulovský, P., “Active Low-Energy Belite Cement, Cement and Concrete Research”, V. 68, 2015, pp. 203–210.

8. Gomes, C.M., and de Oliveira, A.D.S., “Chemical phases and microstructural analysis of pastes based on magnesia cement”, Construction and Building Materials, V. 188, 2018, pp. 615–620.

9. Canonico, F., “Special Binders as an Alternative to Portland Cement”, 20th International Conference on Building Materials, 2018, pp. 410-422.

10. Telesca, A., Marroccoli, M., and Winnefeld F., “Synthesis and Characterization of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cements Produced by Different Chemical Gypsums”, Advances in Cement Research, V. 31(3), 2019, pp. 113–123.

11. Chaunsali P., and Vaishnav K., “Calcium-Sulfoaluminate-Belite Cements: Opportunities and Challenge”, The Indian Concrete Journal, V. 94, 2020, pp. 18–25.

12. Gastaldi, D., Bertola, F., Irico, S., Paul, G., and Canonico, F., “Hydration Behavior of Cements with Reduced Clinker Factor in Mixture with Sulfoaluminate Binder ”, Cement and Concrete Research, V. 139, 2021, p. 106261.

13. Paul, G., Boccaleri, E., Marchese, L., Buzzi, L., Canonico, F., and Gastaldi, D., “Low Temperature Sulfoaluminate Clinkers: The Role of Sulfates and Silicates on the Different Hydration Behavior”, Construction and Building Materials, V. 268, 2021, p.

121111.

14. Dung, N.T., and Unluer, C., “Advances in the hydration of reactive MgO cement blends incorporating different magnesium carbonates”, Construction and Building Materials, V. 294, 2021, p. 123573.

15. Capasso, I., Liguori, B., Ferone, C., Caputo, D., and Cioffi, R., “Strategies for the valorization of soil waste by geopolymer production: An overview”, Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 288, 201, p. 125646.

16. Occhicone, A., Vukčević, M., Bosković, I., and Ferone, C., “Red Mud-Blast Furnace Slag-Based Alkali-Activated Materials”, Sustainability, 2021, p. 132011298.