In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Cyclic Loading Test for Walls of Aspect Ratio 1.0 and 0.5 with Grade 550 MPa (80 ksi) Shear Reinforcing Bars
Author(s): Jang-Woon Baek, Hong-Gun Park, Jae-Hoon Lee, and Chang-Joon Bang
Publication: Structural Journal
Appears on pages(s): 969-982
Keywords: cyclic loading; high-strength reinforcing bars; reinforcing bar ratio; shear strength; squat shear walls
Abstract:In the shear design of massive walls in nuclear power plants, high-strength reinforcing bars need to be employed to enhance the constructibility and economy of the walls. In the present study, walls with aspect ratios of 1.0 and 0.5 were tested under cyclic lateral loading to investigate the effect of 550 MPa (80 ksi) reinforcing bars on the shear strength of squat walls. The test parameters included the grade of shear reinforcement, the failure mode, and the presence of boundary hoops. The ratios of the test shear strength to ACI 349 prediction (that is, safety margins) were 1.54 to 1.90 and 1.11 to 1.38 for the general and seismic provisions, respectively. The test results of walls with 550 MPa (80 ksi) reinforcing bars were comparable to those of walls with 420 MPa (60 ksi) reinforcing bars for all three evaluations: failure mode, safety margin, and average crack width.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber