In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Cyclic Loading Test for Reinforced Concrete Walls (Aspect Ratio 2.0) with Grade 550 MPa (80 ksi) Shear Reinforcing Bars
Author(s): Jang-Woon Baek, Hong-Gun Park, Hyun-Mock Shin, and Sang-Jun Yim
Publication: Structural Journal
Appears on pages(s): 673-686
Keywords: cyclic loading; high-strength reinforcing bars; reinforced concrete walls; reinforcing bar ratio; shear strength
Abstract:In shear design of massive walls in nuclear power plants, the use of high-strength reinforcing bars is necessary to enhance the constructability and economy. In the present study, walls with an aspect ratio of 2.0 were tested under cyclic lateral loading to investigate the effect of 550 MPa (80 ksi) bars on shear strength of slender walls. The test parameters were shear reinforcement grade, shear reinforcement ratio, and failure mode. Most test specimens failed due to diagonal tension cracking. The ratios of the test shear strength to ACI 349 prediction (that is, safety margins) were 1.48 to 1.83 and 1.18 to 1.46 for general and seismic provisions, respectively. The test results of walls with 550 MPa (80 ksi) bars were similar to those of walls with 420 MPa (60 ksi) bars: failure mode, safety margin, and average crack width. The test results and failure modes were confirmed by nonlinear finite element analysis results.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber