Fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) are commonly used to seismically retrofit concrete structural walls. Limited design guidance for the seismic application of FRP strengthening is currently available to designers in guidelines such as ACI PRC-440.2-17 or standards like ASCE/SEI 41-17. This paper presents the description and results of an experimental effort to investigate the effectiveness of FRP retrofitted concrete walls. The specimen wall thickness was either 6 in or 12 in, which represents a typical range of wall thickness seen in older buildings. To better reflect the most common applications seen in the industry, the walls were retrofitted with FRP, and anchored with fiber anchors only on one side of the wall. The study demonstrates that the effectiveness of FRP is reduced as the wall thickness increases and that the FRP must be anchored to the wall for any tangible benefit. The results are used to assess the current provisions in ACI PRC-440.2-17 and ASCE/SEI 41-17. It is apparent that additional testing is required to better understand the complexities involved in the FRP strengthening of shear walls and such testing is scheduled for the near future.

This paper presents a new methodology for characterizing the failure mode of structural walls reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. An analytical model is used to derive a non-dimensional failure determinant function, which is validated against existing test results. The function involves geometric attributes (wall length, wall height, and boundary element size), reinforcement ratios (horizontal and vertical), and material properties (compressive strength of concrete and tensile strength of GFRP bars). According to the determinant function, structural walls fail in flexure when a high aspect ratio is associated with a relatively low reinforcement ratio in the boundary element. The proposed methodology and design recommendations provide valuable guidance for practitioners dealing with GFRP-reinforced concrete walls.

Fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) structures have won researchers’ attention for decades as a considerable substitute due to their superb mechanical and non-mechanical properties. Despite the promising potential of concrete structures with glass FRP and basalt FRP that were shown by previous research, there are few specifications for the seismic design of FRP-RC structures to date due to limited research data on their seismic behavior. This paper focuses on the seismic performance of concrete columns with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement by finite element modeling. The effect of longitudinal reinforcement type and ratio, stirrup spacing, concrete strength and axial load ratio are included in the parametric analysis in VecTor2. Properly designed CFRP-RC columns with good confinement generally reach high load-carrying capacity and deformation level, while high axial load could induce relatively severe damage. To verify these conclusions, seven full-scale columns are under construction and will be tested under combined lateral reversed cyclic loading and constant axial loading.

The use of FRP tendons has become an attractive alternative to steel tendons in prestressed concrete structures to avoid strength and serviceability problems related to corrosion of steel. There is however a lack of knowledge in serviceability behavior related to deflection after cracking for beams prestressed with FRP tendons. Conventional approaches used to compute deflection of cracked members prestressed with steel is problematic at best, and the situation is exacerbated further with the use of FRP tendons having a lower modulus of elasticity than steel. Deflection of FRP reinforced (nonprestressed) concrete flexural members computed with Branson’s effective moment of inertia 𝐼􀀁 requires a correction factor (called a softening factor) that reduces the member stiffness sufficiently to provide reasonable estimates of post-cracking deflection. For FRP prestressed concrete however, this approach does not always work as expected and deflection can be either underestimated or overestimated significantly.

This study investigates the accuracy of different models proposed for estimating deflection of cracked FRP prestressed members using a database of 38 beams collected from the literature. All beams are fully prestressed. Results indicate that using Branson’s effective moment of inertia 𝐼􀀁 with a generic softening factor can produce reasonable estimates of deflection provided the 𝐼􀀁 response is shifted up to the decompression moment or adjusted with an effective prestress moment defined by an effective eccentricity of the prestress force. The former approach overpredicts deflection by 20% on average while the latter overpredicts deflection by not more than 5% based on the beams available for comparison. Assuming a bilinear moment deflection response overpredicts deflection by 12%, while an approach proposed by Bischoff (which also shifts the 𝐼􀀁 response upwards) overpredicts deflection by 23%. These last two approaches work reasonably well without the need for a correction factor.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) 440.1R-15 Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars linearly reduces the bar stress and thereby pull-out capacity of FRP bars to zero from an embedment length at 20 bar diameters (db) or less. Most experimental research and data examine the development length of various FRP bars at longer, more traditional, embedment lengths. A database was created from select available data in literature to compare to empirical standards. This investigation examines the bond performance of short embedded FRP bars into concrete considering a pull-out failure mode to expand the understanding of short embedded FRP bars into concrete. Based upon the database collected, for the glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars, the current 440.1R appear quite conservative. For the basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebar database collected, the current ACI 440.1R-15 provisions appear unconservative for a statistically significant number of the specimen test results within the database. In the case of the carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) database, which is quite limited, the data appears to develop considerably less bond strength than the current 440.1R provisions might suggest which requires deeper investigation for the case of short embedment length bonded CFRP bars.