Serviceability checks in Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements involves the verification of crack width mainly aimed to limit the exposure of the steel reinforcement to corrosion and chemical attack and, thus, improve durability. Classical approaches for assessing the crack width in RC elements provide the calculation of two terms: 1) the average crack spacing, and 2) the average difference between the strain in the steel reinforcement and in the concrete in tension referred to the average crack spacing. A similar approach can be assumed valid also for RC elements strengthened with externally bonded Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials, taking into account the additional tension stiffening effect provided by the external reinforcement.

This paper presents the comparisons of some existing code formulations for predicting crack spacing and crack width in RC elements with the experimental results of a database collected by the Authors and concerning tests on RC beams and ties externally bonded with different types and configurations of FRP materials. The paper is mainly aimed to check the reliability of the existing equations provided by codes in order to address the future assessment of reliable design provisions for cracking verifications in RC elements strengthened with FRP materials. The comparisons have evidenced, indeed, some useful issues for the design provisions: 1) larger scatter in the predictions of crack width than in crack spacing and, in particular, for ties, 2) limited effect of shrinkage on crack width, 3) necessity of taking into account the external reinforcement in crack spacing formulations, 4) good reliability of mechanical models for calculating cracks width.

While reinforced concrete is one of the most used construction materials, traditional reinforcement steel may cause undesirable side effects, as corrosion and the associated volume changes can lead to damages in the concrete matrix and can cause spalling, which may significantly reduce the load-bearing capacity and service life of structures. Alternative reinforcement methods, such as glass or basalt fiber reinforced polymer rebars, can serve as a viable alter-native to reduce or eliminate some of the disadvantages associated with steel reinforcement. In addition to an increased tensile strength and a reduction in weight, fiber reinforced polymer rebars also offer a high corrosion resistance among other beneficial properties. Because these materials are not fully regulated yet and the durability properties have not been conclusively determined, further research is needed to evaluate the material durability properties of FRP rebars. To determine the durability properties of GFRP and BFRP rebars in cold climates, the freeze-thaw resistance of these materials was evaluated throughout this study. Specifically, two types of materials (basalt and glass reinforced polymers) and two common rebar sizes (8 mm (#2) and 16 mm (#5) diameters) were tested. To quantify the freeze-thaw-durability, tensile tests according to ASTM D7205, transverse shear strength tests in line with ASTM D7617, and horizontal shear strength tests as specified in ASTM D4475 were conducted on numerous virgin fiber rebars and on fiber rebars that were subjected to 80 and 160 freeze-thaw cycles. While the results from the virgin materials served as benchmark values, the measurements and analysis from the aged (by freeze-thaw cycles) materials were used to quantify and determine the strength retention capacity of these bars. The results showed that a higher number of freeze-thaw cycles lead to lower strength retention for some rebar types. In addition, it was seen that rebar products respond differently to the aging process; while some material properties notably deteriorated, other material properties were insignificantly affected.

Worldwide, the need for additional and improved infrastructure is critical. The deterioration of infrastructure has become an increasing challenge and burden on the world's economy, environment, and society. Historically, most structures worldwide have been built without durability and service-life consideration, and their premature failure reflects an acute crisis within the construction industry and the environment. Including synthetic polypropylene macrofiber in concrete structures ensures the maximizing of durability and service life extension and offers potential reductions in the binder content and reinforcing steel materials that contribute to resource depletion, environmental impacts, and increased economic burden. These material reductions and service life improvements present housing and infrastructure construction opportunities that protect the environment and ensure public safety, health, security, serviceability, and life cycle cost-effectiveness.

This study explores technological advancements enabling the utilization of GFRP bars in concrete structures, particularly in coastal areas. However, GFRP bars often encounter reduced bend strength at specific bend locations, which may pose a challenge in their practical application. Various properties such as the strength of bent GFRP bars are crucial for quality assurance, yet existing testing methods stated in ASTM D7914M-21 and ACI 440.3R-15 have limitations when applied to different GFRP bent shapes. Furthermore, those methods require special precautions to ensure symmetry and avoid eccentricities in specimens. To address these challenges, CSA S807:19 introduced a simpler standardized testing procedure that involves embedding a single L-shaped GFRP stirrup in a concrete block. However, the specified large block size in CSA S807:19 Annex E may pose difficulties for both laboratory and on-site quality control tests. Therefore, CSA S807:19 Annex E (Clause 7.1.2b) permits the use of a customized block size, as long as it meets the bend strength of the FRP bars without causing concrete splitting. To date, very few prior research has explored the use of custom block sizes. Therefore, this study aims to thoroughly investigate the strength of bent FRP bars with custom block sizes and without block confinement. Such an investigation serves to highlight the user-friendliness and efficiency of the CSA S807:19 Annex E method. The study recommends two block sizes: 200x400x300 mm (7.87x15.75x11.81 in) for bars <16 mm (0.63 in) diameter and 200x200x300 mm (7.87x7.87x11.81 in) for bars <12 mm (0.39 in). Additionally, the study cautions against using confinement reinforcement, especially with smaller blocks, as it could interfere with the embedded bent FRP bar. Furthermore, the study suggests incorporating additional tail length to mitigate the debonding effects resulting from fixing the strain gauges to the bent portion of the embedded FRP bar. By exploring these modifications, the study seeks to enhance the effectiveness of the testing procedure and expand its practical application for both laboratory and on-site quality assurance. The findings hold implications for the reliable testing of GFRP bars' strength, advancing their use as reinforcement in concrete structures.

Concrete is the substance most consumed by humanity after water. Blended cements in which part of the energy intensive clinker is replaced by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are the by far the most realistic means to obtain large scale CO2 reductions in the short-to-midterm, attending the urgency of the climate emergency. LC3, blended cement produced by the combination of limestone, calcined clays and Portland cement provides a solution that achieves equivalent mechanical performance to OPC, better durability against chloride penetration and ASR and a reduction of CO2 emissions by about 40%. Due to the similarities of LC3 with OPC, it is a material that can be adopted today using the same construction equipment and workforce worldwide.